Introduction

The construction industry faces a constant challenge: how to deliver complex projects on time and within budget. A common tempting approach is to break projects into the minutest of tasks, thinking it will bring control and speed. But this backfires. The more we fragment work, the more we create handoff points – where one task depends on another. This leads to a tangled web of coordination, slowing things down and causing more delays.

Toyota's car factories do things radically different. They use "work cells," where teams focus on building a whole section of the car together, not just one tiny part. This means less coordination, fewer handoffs, and ultimately, a faster, smoother process.

By learning from Toyota, the construction industry can embrace consolidation – grouping related tasks together – to overcome the problems caused by fragmentation and build projects faster and more efficiently.

Toyota's Cell Manufacturing: Minimizing Coordination for Maximum Efficiency

Decades ago, the automotive industry faced a dilemma: how to balance control with efficiency in complex production processes. Henry Ford's assembly line, while revolutionary in its time, suffered from inherent limitations due to its fragmented approach. Each worker focused on a single, repetitive task, leading to a disjointed process rife with potential bottlenecks and inefficiencies.

Toyota's Cell Manufacturing System (CMS), a cornerstone of the Toyota Production System (TPS), emerged as a radical departure from this model. It focused on grouping related tasks into self-contained cells, fostering a more cohesive and efficient production process

Cell Manufacturing: A Solution to Coordination and Resource Challenges

Inside Toyota's Camry Plant: A Closer Look at Cell Manufacturing in Action

Toyota's Camry assembly line exemplifies the benefits of cell manufacturing. The line is divided into numerous cells, each responsible for a specific component or subassembly, such as the door, engine, or chassis.

Within each cell, a team of multi-skilled workers collaboratively completes a series of related tasks. They have immediate access to all necessary resources, minimizing downtime and ensuring a smooth workflow. If an issue arises, the team can quickly address it without waiting for instructions from central management. Once the cell completes its tasks, the work is passed on to the next cell as a finished subassembly, minimizing the risk of errors and rework.‍

The Impact of Cell Manufacturing

The impact of Toyota's cell manufacturing system has been significant:

• Reduced Coordination Loss: By decentralizing coordination and empowering cell teams, Toyota has streamlined communication and decision-making. This streamlined approach resulted in a documented 50% reduction in production lead time compared to traditional assembly lines.
  (Shingo, S. (1989). A study of the Toyota production system from an industrial engineering viewpoint. Productivity Press.)
• Optimized Resource Utilization: Each cell is equipped with the necessary resources, ensuring that workers and equipment are always engaged in value-adding activities. This has led to a reported 15% increase in labor productivity in some Toyota plants.
  (Liker, J. K. (2004). The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the world's greatest manufacturer. McGraw Hill Professional.)

• Minimized Rework: The focus on completing a set of related tasks within a cell before passing on the work has significantly reduced the need for rework. Toyota claims a defect rate of less than 0.01% in some of its assembly lines, a testament to the effectiveness of cell manufacturing in ensuring quality.                                 (Toyota Motor Corporation. (2023). Toyota Production System.)

From Factory Floor to Construction Site‍

Why Construction Projects Fall Short: A Closer Look at Real-World Challenges

To understand why construction projects haven't fully embraced the benefits of the learnings from cell manufacturing, we need to examine the common pitfalls of traditional project management.

It all begins with creating a project plan, essentially a logical sequence or network of tasks. Each task comes with three key inputs: duration, dependencies, and required resources (manpower, materials, equipment, and even management capacity and cash flow). The ideal plan envisions a well-coordinated effort of stakeholders, each respecting technical dependencies and smoothly handing off work to the next.

Despite the detailed planning, real-world implementation often brings unavoidable changes, delays, and resource shortages. When delays strike, the immediate reaction is often to "create a catch-up plan." This usually means starting future tasks early and allowing tasks to run in parallel instead of sequentially, violating dependencies.

Let’s try to picture this problem

Consider a simple example: you planned to complete 50 out of 100 foundations before starting the erection work to avoid overwhelming coordination between the civil and erection teams. However unforeseen groundwater issues mean only 20 foundations are ready. The rushed decision is to start erection on those 20 and tackle the rest alongside the remaining foundation work. Suddenly, coordination efforts explode as the erection team jumps around, trying to match the pace of the still-struggling civil team.

The moment we start Fragmenting tasks it amplifies the coordination effort multi-folds. Instead of one smooth flow, the project becomes a chaotic jumble of overlapping tasks, each screaming for resources and attention. This leads to rework, miscommunication, and further delays.

While technology might seem like the answer to managing this coordination, it has been established well by the leading reports that despite the massive investment in sophisticated project management tools, the projects are still delayed and over budget, and coordination losses account for 25%-50% of those delays.

So, are we at a dead end?

What if we can obviate the co-ordination all together?

What if we could learn from Toyota's cell manufacturing and embrace consolidation instead of fragmentation of work?

This radical shift could lead to dramatic improvements in construction project delivery. By grouping related tasks into self-contained work packages, we can minimize coordination and handoffs, and optimize resource utilization.

Realization’s clients are already doing this by following a simple approach called 'Focus-&-Finish'

Talk to our experts about how this ‘Focus-&-Finish’ approach can transform your projects.

‍

‍